What happened
Federal judges in Maryland and California Thursday ordered the Trump administration to rehire thousands of probationary workers they said were improperly fired across 19 agencies. Thursday was also President Donald Trump’s deadline for federal agencies to submit plans for further “mass” workforce reductions and significant budget cuts.
Who said what
The “back-to-back rulings were the most significant blow yet” to efforts by Trump and Elon Musk’s DOGE team to “drastically shrink the federal bureaucracy,” Reuters said. Judge William Alsup in San Francisco and, hours later, Judge James Bredar in Baltimore both said the White House had not followed the proper legal procedures to lay off at least 24,000 probationary employees. They also criticized the administration for blaming the mass firings on performance reviews, with Alsup calling that a “sham to avoid statutory requirements.”
Alsup said the White House Office of Personnel Management had unlawfully directed the firings of probationary employees at six agencies, taking advantage of their fewer worker protections. “It is a sad, sad day when our government would fire some good employee and say it was based on performance when they know good and well that’s a lie,” he said. Bredar’s ruling, covering 18 agencies, focused on efforts to sidestep federal “rules intended to ensure that states are ready to bear the load cast upon them when mass layoffs occur.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Government lawyers said Trump has broad authority to fire workers and claimed that individual agencies directed the firings, not OPM. The administration “faces dozens of legal challenges to agency dismantlings” and other DOGE-related cuts and information access, The Washington Post said. Several “federal judges have grown frustrated by the inability of the government’s own lawyers to answer straightforward questions” about DOGE’s structure or activities, The New York Times said. Two judges in Washington this week ordered DOGE to hand over documents and answer questions about its role in Trump’s government downsizing, and submit to Freedom of Information Act requests.
What next?
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Trump administration “will immediately fight back” against the “absurd and unconstitutional” rulings. The White House also said it would release the details of each agency’s second round of cuts and mass layoffs “once the plans are enacted.”
